Страница 9 из 25
Книга подготовлена в секторе формирования и развития ТПК Института экономики и организации промышленного производства СО РАН. В ее написании приняли участие сотрудники:
от Института экономики и организации промышленного производства СО РАН (Новосибирск):
В. В. Воробьева (гл. 6, 12, 15), И. А. Вижина (глава 11), канд. экон. наук Т. Н. Есикова (гл. 6, 10, 12, 15), В. Д. Ионова (гл. 6, 15, вступительная статья), д-р экон. наук В. Ю. Малов (введение, гл. 2, 6, 10, 12, 13, 15, заключение), канд. экон. наук Б. В. Мелентьев (гл. 2, 5), Л. В. Мельникова (гл. 1), д-р техн. наук В. Н. Павлов (гл. 12, 13), канд. экон. наук В. Н. Харитонова (гл. 11);
от Института истории СО РАН (Новосибирск):
чл. – кор. РАН В. А. Ламин (гл. 3);
от Института систем энергетики им. Л. А. Мелентьева СО РАН (Иркутск):
д-р техн. наук Б. Г. Санеев (гл. 9), канд. экон. наук С. Ю. Музычук (гл. 9), канд. экон. наук С. П. Попов (гл. 9), канд. экон. наук Л. А. Платонов (гл. 9), канд. экон. наук А. Д. Соколов (гл. 9);
от Института монголоведения, буддологии и тибетологии СО РАН (Улан-Удэ):
д-р ист. наук Б. В. Базаров (гл. 4), канд. ист. наук Д. В. Ганжуров (гл. 4);
от Института экономики ДВО РАН (Хабаровск):
канд. экон. наук А. Б. Бардаль (гл. 14), канд. экон. наук Е. И. Деваева (гл. 7), канд. экон. наук В. Д. Калашников (гл. 14);
от Института мировой экономики и международных отношений РАН (Москва):
д-р экон. наук В. Г. Варнавский (гл. 16); от Евроазиатского транспортного союза (Москва): канд. экон. наук С. С. Гончаренко (гл. 5); от Морского государственного университета (Владивосток):
д-р экон. наук Л. Б. Винокур (гл. 14);
от Совета по изучению производительных сил и экономическому сотрудничеству РАН (Москва):
д-р экон. наук А. Н. Пилясов (гл. 8); от Института географии РАН (Москва):
д-р геогр. наук С. А. Тархов (гл. 13);
от Сибирского государственного университета путей сообщения (Новосибирск):
д-р экон. наук В. Я. Ткаченко (гл. 13).
От администрации Красноярского края (Красноярск):
Т. Г. Шереметова (гл. 15)
Introduction
In this monograph the experience of studies within 2002–2004 period made by a big group of researchers of various specialities belonging to many academic, research or development organizations located in Vladivostok, Khabarovsk, Irkutsk, Novosibirsk, Krasnoyarsk and Moscow has been generalized. The book has been designed by Mark Konstantinovich Bandman (1924–2002), remarkable man, authoritative scientist with a world-known name. He was the head of economic and geographic research using mathematical methods at the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian branch of Academy of Sciences of the USSR and then Russian Federation during more than 30 year period. We consider finishing this work our duty, all the more his ideas and theoretical basics became the foundation of many chapters and paragraphs of this monograph.
The conduction of Baikal economical forum in 2000 in Irkutsk gave a reason for the President of Russian Federation to set a problem of both strategy of economic development of Siberia and transport strategy of whole Russia. Studies made by the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering within both strategies confirmed once again that the growth of Russian economy depends on the development of its Asian part strongly. In addition, the local growth rate of Gross Domestic Product should not outrun the average one in Russia. Moreover the territory labor division has its present shape when process industries, services and other industries having high share of value added are concentrated in European part of the country while resource industries – in Asian part. However these industries predetermine the possibility of stable motion, not dependant from external factors and the third countries, of whole Russia along the way of meeting the crisis of 90s. The role both Asian Russia resources and Asian economic and geographic location continues staying crucial. While outer, visible, and exposed in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), demonstrates itself more on the West of country, deep, material basics of this effect are founded mainly in the East. This is the reason why we consider necessary to separate the problems of this part of the country and pay attention on the must of active government regional policy in Asian Russia and more active participation of the state in realization of a number of big infrastructure projects which commercial effectiveness (as distinct from national economic effectiveness) only partly answers the market frameworks.
Government participation can differs in forms and the financial part of such participation is not the most effective. More important, in our opinion, to create the conditions for realization of above mentioned projects by private companies which interests coincide with state ones at this very moment and territory. Moreover, the state, its federal bodies and regional authorities, should play the important role of a coordinator for the interests of companies and firms towards the achievement of common national goals.
Siberian resources, both mineral and natural (including territory itself) are the «titbits» for many states having the lack of such resources. And this lack will increase in future. This idea has been known and stated more than 100 years ago and the understanding that Siberia and Far East could not be considered only from the commercial point of view existed from the begi
Processes of population growth continuing for four century period turn back. This is an unprecedented phenomenon in Russian history. It may not cause the big anxiety if re-emigration and population loss of Russians on Far East accompanied by the threat of Chinese immigration. Present estimation of demographic situation and the prospect of keeping Far East territories have an astonishing similarity with forecasts and hypotheses made more than 100 years ago. Theme of most scenarios on demographic future of Far East is like a statement of fatal predetermined and imminent loss of Far East domains of Russia/«Yellow danger, yellow threat, yellow expansion, yellow labor force, yellow domination» – is a lexicon of pre-soviet administrators of Far East, which was used by them while claiming for urgent help to higher state hierarchy. However higher authorities was not in a hurry like in our days because it had no ideas what to do and how to find finances to defend Far East frontiers, like in present time. Historical parallels though can not be directive orders in solving present problems. But they serve a lesson how to seek and find optimal practical solutions of our modern problems.
Once more our society feels confusion while meeting the challenge of present time though this challenge has more than a century ages. In Russia almost always new is something that should be solved in past but was preserved and left for the future.
In the monograph two co