Страница 282 из 340
and simple.
[...]
David Jernigan directs international programs for The Marin Institute. He is the author of
Thirsting for Markets: The Global Impact of Corporate Alcohol.
Copyright 2000 Marin Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol Other Drug Problems
The original article from which the above excerpts were taken can be found on the
Marin Institute web site at www.marininstitute.org/NL2000a.html.
What you are obligated to do
(1) Retract and correct The French Paradox. You must bring to public attention two
things: that the evidence presented in your two French Paradox broadcasts was
insufficient to justify your conclusions to the effect that drinking wine prolongs life
(as explained in my letter to you of 21Apr99, already cited above); and that broader
scientific evidence than you reported in your broadcasts, or since, contradicts your
conclusions (as illustrated in the Marin Institute excerpts above). Your unwarranted
and false conclusions advocating wine consumption ca
harm upon the public as they do today. Your obligation to journalism, to 60 Minutes, to
the public, and to your conscience, demands that you issue such a retraction and
correction without reservation and without delay.
(2) Disclose any conflict of interest relating to The French Paradox. Please
disclose any consideration that you may have received, or that 60 Minutes or CBS may
have received, from the wine or alcohol industries for your two French Paradox
broadcasts. In the absence of affirmations on your part that no such consideration has
traded hands, your broadcasts may tend to be viewed less as defective reporting than as
infomercials. Of particular interest would be the nature of any relationship between 60
Minutes and Edgar Bronfman Senior, chairman of liquor giant Seagram.
(3) Retract and correct The Ugly Face of Freedom. Every day, growing numbers of
people become convinced that you owe a similar retraction and correction for your
similarly incorrect and damaging 23Oc94 broadcast, The Ugly Face of Freedom.
(4) Disclose any conflict of interest relating to The Ugly Face of Freedom. Please
disclose the degree to which your broadcast The Ugly Face of Freedom was requested by
external sources, who these sources were, and what benefits to 60 Minutes or to CBS
accrued from complying with such external requests. Of particular interest would be any
request originating from the direction of Edgar Bronfman Senior. You need to take some
such step in order to disarm the suspicion that your broadcast was no better than an
eruption of the hatred toward non-Jews, and particularly of the special hatred toward
Ukrainians, which is endemic to Jewish culture.
Lubomyr Prytulak
HOME DISINFORMATION PEOPLE WIESENTHAL 747 hits since 18Jan98
Wiesenthal Letter 14 Sep 4/97 The forgotten Bodnar
September 4, 1997
Simon Wiesenthal
Jewish Documentation Center
Salztorgasse 6
1010 Vie
Austria
Dear Mr. Wiesenthal:
In your testimony on the 60 Minutes broadcast of October 23, 1994 "The Ugly Face of Freedom" I notice a startling
omission:
MORLEY SAFER: I get the impression from people that the actions of the Ukrainians, if anything,
were worse than the Germans.
SIMON WIESENTHAL: About the civilians, I ca
That's all you said! You just left it at that! But in that case, there is something very big missing from your
statement, isn't there Mr. Wiesenthal - something very interesting, very important, very relevant? Something that the
60 Minutes viewer would have found to be quite remarkable? Do you know what it is?
It is the story of the Ukrainian policeman with the surname Bodnar the one who saved your life? Remember him?
Don't you think that this forgotten Bodnar is someone who should have been mentioned in your statement? And doesn't
the story of the forgotten Bodnar somewhat contradict your unqualified statement that the Ukrainian police
collectively were worse than the Germans? And if among what you say is the worst of the Ukrainians (the auxiliary
police) some are saving Jews, then what heroic acts can we expect among the rest of the Ukrainian population?
To refresh your memory about this story which seems so forgettable to you now, I may remind you that you were
about to be executed, but:
The shooting stopped. Ten yards from Wiesenthal.
The next thing he remembers was a brilliant cone of light and behind it a Polish voice: "But
Mr. Wiesenthal, what are you doing here?" Wiesenthal recognized a foreman he used to know, by
the name of Bodnar. He was wearing civilian clothes with the armband of a Ukrainian police
auxiliary. "I've got to get you out of here tonight."
Bodnar told the [other] Ukrainians that among the captured Jews he had discovered a Soviet
spy and that he was taking him to the district police commissar. In actual fact he took
Wiesenthal back to his own flat, on the grounds that it was unlikely to be searched so soon
again. This was the first time Wiesenthal survived. (Peter Michael Lingens, in Simon
Wiesenthal, Justice Not Vengeance, 1989, p. 8)
But the story of the forgotten Bodnar is even better than that - Bodnar not only saved you, not only risked his
life to save you, but possibly gave his life to save you. I say that because Bodnar must have known that the
punishment for saving a Jew from execution and then helping him escape would be death. And how could he get away with
it? In fact, I ask you now, Mr. Wiesenthal, whether the forgotten Bodnar did get away with it, or whether he paid for
it with his life, for as you were tiptoeing out, you were stopped, Bodnar offered his fabricated story, and then:
The German sergeant, already a little drunk, slapped Bodnar's face and said: "Then what are you
standing around for? If this is what you people are like, then later we'll all have troubles.
Report back to me as soon as you deliver them [Wiesenthal along with a fellow prisoner]." (Alan
Levy, The Wiesenthal File, 1993, p. 37)
These passages invite several pertinent conclusions which a man of integrity and conscience would have insisted
on bringing to Morley Safer's attention:
(1) You yourself, Mr. Wiesenthal, can see a Ukrainian police official having his face slapped by a German
sergeant, which serves to remind you that Ukraine is under occupation, to show you who is really in charge, to suggest
that the German attitude toward Ukrainians is one of contempt and that the expression of this contempt is
unrestrained.
(2) You yourself see also that Bodnar's flat is subject to searches, indicating that although he is a participant
in the anti-Jewish actions, he is a distrusted participant, and a participant who might feel intimidated by the
hostile scrutiny of the occupying Nazis.
(3) But most important of all, you see that the German sergeant is waiting for Bodnar to report back. Alan Levy
writes that "Bodnar was ... concerned ... that now he [Bodnar] had to account, verbally at least, for his two
prisoners" (p. 37). If Bodnar reports back with the news that you, Mr. Wiesenthal, escaped, then how might Bodnar
expect the face-slapping German sergeant to respond? For Bodnar at this point in the story to actually allow you, Mr.
Wiesenthal, to escape is heroic, it is self-sacrificing, it is suicidal. And yet the forgotten Bodnar does go ahead
and effect your escape, probably never imagining that in later years this will become an event unworthy of notice