Страница 183 из 340
infectious diseases, must be stopped. Anonymous letters from hospitals on behalf of
Immigration with same insinuations are unacceptable as well. I have also received a receipt for
a blood test for syphilis, which I never did, from a Lab, where I never went. I was also called by
two other laboratories, which pretend that I did tests for infectious diseases, and this is not
true. All such provocation must be stopped immediately!
.
All 5 (or 6) documents must be evaluated to consider and answer my complaint. Please,
answer all questions, which arise from the documents. I ask you to respond to this complaint in
writing. However, another solution is just to consider my case as "finished" with no further
demands. Will appreciate your cooperation.
Yours,
Lev GUNIN
November 30 2000
Chronology in GUNINS' case
November 1994
refugee claim
March 1997
refugee claim rejected.
(In the negative decision our refugee
claim description was severely
distorted; document includes such
direct and indirect statements as a)
nothing bad could happen in such a
beautiful country like Israel, b) people
who were taken to Israel for
Sochnut's expense are property of
Israel, c) people who refused to
change their believes and opinions
are guilty on persecutions themselves
because provoked them c) no
minimum of confidence). January
1998
- Federal Court closing our case on a
ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no
minimal confidence" ruling.
January 2000
- positive decision in response to our
humanitarian appeal.
March 2000
an interview lead to the Certificat de
selectione du Quebec issuing by
Quebec's Immigration
March 2000
bureaucratic humiliation and blatant
manipulation of medical data by
Federal Immigration starts to torpid
the completion of the case
Chronology in
Elisabetha GUNIN (Epstein's)
case:.1994
refugee claim + Wanda Brzezinska,
M.D. makes a false report (see Doc.
4b, 7a, 7b).
March 1997
refugee claim rejected.
January 1998
- Federal Court closing our case on a
ridiculous ground of Immigration's "no
minimal confidence" ruling.
November 1998
marriages a Canadian citizen
November 22 1999
my mother's marriage interview.
Nov. 23, Madame Helene ROY
replaces the initiative negative
decision, based on "medical
concerns" (dr. Brzezinska's rapport),
by a positive one.
January 2000 - Certificat de
selectione du Quebec was issued for
my mother.
January 2000, a ruling from IMS
ordering my mother additional tests:
strum creatinine (blood test) and
echocardiogram.
June 30, 2000 - IMS ridiculous
demand of a resume from "the last
visit to cardiologist".
July 27 2000
- rapport of Dr. Gordon Creenstein
(anatomy, not pathology) was
submitted to Immigration.
September 2000
another letter from IMS ordering
another urine test and then a visit to
an urologist.
September 19 2000
offensive letter from Immigration
officer. December 2000
IMS final negative decision confirming
the illegal prejudicial decision from
Nov. 99.
- DOCUMENT NUMBER TWO
To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237)
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
A COPY OF DOCUMENT SUBMITTED TO IMMIGRATION
ON MAY 15 2000
By this letter we ask Immigration's agent assigned to my file to make a special ruling to order medical examinations for all members
of our family, not only for Alla GUNIN, my wife. As we know from our legal advisers, this procedure is required for all family members
for the landed immigrant's status. If you insist that only my wife has to do the medical examination, please, send us a written warrant.
We have a well-grounded suspicion that somebody might use the delay in ordering the medical examination for all members of our
family for artificial sabotage of issuing us the landed immigrant's status. We will appreciate your cooperation.
YOURS TRULY
Lev GUNIN
in name of family GUNIN
The 15 of May 2000
COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER THREE
To Immigration's Complaints Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) December 1 2000
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
I disagree with the Immigration Medical Services decision "ev 7001-850497Z" (with date mentioned: November 23, 2000) from
Ottawa, received by me on November 29, 2000 (anonymous - no name or signature). The goal of this ruling is not to establish the
medical truth but to put a hardship on my family (and me).
My arguments.
(See the decision's text - as it was red to me by dr. Gia
1. The decision ruled that Mr. Gia
on November 29? Does it mean that the date in the letter - "November 23" - was incorrect? Or the letter has not been sent in 2-3 days? Or - if it is known that a letter from Ottawa to Montreal goes 5-6 days - why then I was not given more time? I ask you to submit me an explanation what November 30 means and why not December 10 or January 15? I want to know how the agent justified that particular date. Was that small misconduct pla
2. The suggestion that somebody else went and did the x-ray instead of me was another serious assault. That suggestion was made in ignorance of the fact that on Clark Lab's official (original!) paper IMS (Immigration Medical Service) officer could see my name, date of birth, telephone number, name of the ordering physician, and the number of my medical card (which - everybody knows - has my photo on it). Besides, it mentioned the "MILD PECTUS EXCAVATUM", a cosmetic defect, which I have since birth. Besides, it is known that the film itself has a negative image of the whole ID data! Then this ungrounded abuse was based on nothing and went far beyond any medical or even legal matter.
3. The demand to send an original film from the November 14 x-ray in the light of two above disputed demands might be ungrounded. This x-ray film was already seen by 3 medical doctors: the radiologist at the Clark Lab, dr. Jast (who referred me and evaluated the film), and dr. Gia
Both dr. Jast and Gia
4. It was an abuse to mention that "After overview if necessary applicant may have to be referred to the chest specialist." It is a prejudgment and prejudice. "...if necessary", "may" are just a form. It is a very clear message that he/she will not let me alone! Why to speak about next medical procedure before seeing the x-ray?
Lev GUNIN Dec. 01 2000
Copy - DOCUMENT NUMBER FIVE
From Lev GUNIN ( 514-499-1294)
Document 5
LETTER TO THE MONTREAL CHEST INSTITUTE - A Copy
(The letter was submitted on November 09 in respond to an anonymous letter from the Montreal Chest Institute received on November 6 2000; below you can find a modified version (November 12-14), which was submitted to the same destination on November 15).