Страница 182 из 340
Document 11
An order-receipt (payment) to pay for the blood test for syphilis, which was never done.
Another document (Document 12) shows that dr. Gia
test samples, taken at his office. The blood test for syphilis was not required by Immigration in
my case. It was also mentioned that a patient must only appear for this test in the CDL
Laboratories, in other words samples taken outside CDL Lab are not admitting for evaluation
for syphilis.
Document 12
Strum creatinine test's form from CDL Lab form for my mother. The test was ordered by dr.
Gia
Document 13-a
Front page of the IMS ruling from November 23 letter (received on November 28).
Corresponds to Document 3. Also was mentioned in Documents 1, 4, 6. Document 13-b is the
text of the internal part of the same ruling, addressing to dr. Gia
Document 14-a
Ruling from IMS to my mother, Elisabetha Epstein from January 17 2000. This document is
anonymous, no names, telephone numbers. Document 14-b is the text of the internal part of
the same ruling, addressing to dr. Gia
Document 15-a
Ruling from IMS to my mother, Elisabetha Epstein from June 30 2000. This document is
anonymous, no names, telephone numbers. Document 15-b is the text of the internal part of
the same ruling, addressing to dr. Gia
Document 15 plus
September 2000 - letter from IMS ordering another urine test and then a visit to an urologist.
Document 16
An offensive letter from my mother's new immigration officer from September 18 2000.
Document 17
My mother's, Elisabetha Epstein, response (September 20 2000) to an offensive letter from
Immigration (see Document 16).
Document 18
Copy of the positive response to our humanitarian appeal
Document 19
An order from January 11 2000 to my wife, Alla, to undergo the medical examination. Only my
wife's name mentioned in this letter. This letter is a proof that refusing to include all family
members Immigration stalling the completion of our file almost one year now.
Document 20
An order from October 26 2000 to me and my daughter Marta to undergo medical
examination. Was submitted in contradiction with the previous Immigration's assurance that
only my wife has to undergo medical examination.
Document 21-a
X-ray result from Le Centre Radiologique Clarke from November 14 2000, which tremendously
contradict the Immigration's x-ray from November 01 2000 evaluation. In response to TB
double-check request (see Document 21-b) it said "NIL ACTIVE". The film was evaluated by 3
medical doctors, which came to the same "nil active" conclusion. I was seen and evaluated by
2 medical doctors since October 29, who found the TB suspicion ridiculous.
Document 22
X-ray result from November 22 1994 from the Centre Hospitalier Reddy Memorial. On request
of W. Brzezinska, M.D. if there is recent pulmonary infiltrate it said "no recent pulmonary
infiltrate shown".
Document 23
Mr. Z. JAST's certificate for Immigration in relation to the x-ray dispute.
Document 24
Internet-links to two publications, which might accelerate persecutions.
Document 25-a,b
IMS final decision in my mother's case from Dec. 5 2000.
Document 26
Document 27
List of "civil" events. Relates to our will to contribute to the society.
Lev GUNIN December 2 2000 Montreal
COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER ONE
To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) November 30 2000
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
This is the complaint on actions and decisions, which my advisers and I found inadmissible, like
attempts to cause damage to my mother's and my heath. Theoretically falsification and blatant
manipulation of medical data can lead to a forcible treatment from diseases, which one do not
have (it could be lethal).
.
I submit you 5 documents. The First is this one. Second is a complaint against refusal to allow
all my family members medical examinations half a year ago. Third is my disagreement with the
decision of Immigration Health Services from November 23, 2000. Fourth is a shortened
description of events, which manifested abuse of power, ungrounded secrecy, misconduct and
criminal manipulation of medical data. Fifth is a copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest
Institute. Sixth is a wider description of events, with more astonishing and outraged details.
However, because of the length of the Sixth document its submission by fax could be found
offensive, so, please, tell me where to send it by post or e-mail.
I would like to know:
A) Who made all mentioned in six documents unjust decisions (names, position, what their role
in my file).
B) On what ground (law, paragraph, circumstances).
C) Who made a decision, based on a single x-ray: to consider me a potential TB carrier and
submitted it not to Mr. Gia
doctor Gia
radiology unit a part of IMS (ImmMedSrv)?
D) If the x-ray film (made at MCI) could be obtained for copying. My legal advisers and me - we
want to ask you to show it to us at 1010 St Antoine, Montreal. We want to check:
E) If a) there is any technical defect or underwear shadow, which was offensively interpreted
as "TB" b) this x-ray matches my body constitution c) an obviously normal result was blatantly
interpreted as "abnormal". We would like to be given a permission to take this film or its copy to
medical specialists to determine it.
F) How all contradictions, deceptions, violations can be explained (each event).
G) Examples: a) Half a year ago IMS officials refused to submit us ruling and forms for medical
examination for all family members assuring us that only my wife has to go through them. Now
in contradiction with what was said before they ordered my younger daughter and me (now
omitting my older daughter) to do examinations. B) Why my mother's file was illegally attached
to mine. c) How could so many ungrounded medical tests be ruled for my mother, keeping her
more then one year (!) in limbo, etc.
H) How all such decisions might be appealed?
I) Has my mother and me same IMS agents or agents of the same unit? Who are supervisors
of all agents, attached to our files (including Immigration Medical Services - IMS).
J) How to reach them?
K) If Immigration's agents (IMS included) are subjects of Criminal Code - or they are
completely uncontrolled and impunitive.
L) If they are not (impunitive) what is the way to complain about
1. Deliberate damage of my (my family's) financial, social, and psychological situation.
2. Criminal manipulation of the medical data
M) How could I know if W. Brzezinska's M.D. rapport with a "concern" about my health
presents not only in my mother's but in my file as well?
N) Why my file is proceeding not on Montreal - as normally - but in Ottawa?
I must warn you that I will contact police or RCMP in case of any further anonymous calls
("private call" indication) from Immigration and will disregard any letters, until they will not be
signed and carry the name and phone number of the person who is responsible for the
decision. All anonymous telephone calls, which accuse me of concealing a number of