Страница 4 из 5
However person is not only receiver of information, he is its potential source. What sense to him to save everything in himself. It, seeing consciousnesses similar to himself, wishes to share with them that he accumulated, both knowledge, and vital impressions, and, in turn, to receive from them, perhaps, something the useful or interesting. He can ask the help and himself to help someone not only hint, but also action.
Means, the most important from this that is necessary for the person, and therefore, to his consciousness, that he wants and without what he can't live, it is expressing itself. The person can think of himself or others anything, but he always aims to leave behind himself something specific, definite in order to he was remembered: to plant a tree, to build a house, to bring up someone, to come up with the new theory, to write the book, the song, to make the invention, to help the neighbor, or, on the contrary, to punish, to humiliate, to win, to subordinate, to break, to destroy, to ruin, to shoot and etc.
All this together has no relation to the evil and good, and only means aspiration of the person somehow to improve so imperfect world on own understanding. But the world everything doesn't improve in any way, and the person everything doesn't calm down in any way. It isn't let know to him, probably, that imperfection of the world is laid in him. He in any case as the finite will never become as perfect but it and there is nothing so as it deprives of him possibility of fight, development, expression of own imperfection for the sake of the infinite deliverance from it.
It is clear that the human consciousness can express itself only through the material objects surrounding it, as if having revived them by itself, whether it be the book or a saxophone what shows indivisibility of consciousness with beingness, possibility of own implementation in a full form only in it.
So idealists of all colors, in case of desire, can become thoughtful, and materialists – to pay tribute to consciousness and not just the moving matter which is allegedly making everything.
The person will never be able to learn by what beingness will be presented to consciousness after its output from finite, i.e. after death of the person. However, if now when he is living, into the sequential moments of own time merging in his consciousness in smooth flow of life the world before him and in him doesn't stop movement like picture from chirring film, then and after his death presumably movement for consciousness should not stop.
The world can't harden, stop, it, front consciousness and in the very consciousness, can only be transformed into set of other material objects moving differently in some other measurements together with consciousness and according with it. It occurs because beingness can be defined only in the present time of consciousness – in a lift-off from consciousness beingness doesn't exist as well as consciousness doesn't exist without beingness. Consciousness represents as if i
Anyway, each person, unlike inexpressible infinity, understands about the time the fact that he is in its flow, at least, until such time as he shall not die. And it is unimportant for him this process is subjective or objective.
Each person understands that he, unlike animals or plants, has consciousness, i.e. he can in live conversation with similar to him, using a stored database and estimating the information arriving from all directions continuously, to plan own actions, or to foresee the future which actually never comes so as everything happens in his present.
The person before set to works, build in mind a model of own actions or deeds which are not related, as in animals, only with problems of survival, but rather, are associated with often unmotivated desires, dreams, fantasies, thirst for new knowledge, feelings, than, in fact, is his freedom. And when the person loses these aspirations which seem not necessary for the current life, he loses meaning of life, turning in the stupid and often cruel bastard. [5]
What is consciousness, the science didn't define still. The science couldn't even understand, from where undertook consciousness, and from hopelessness decided to recognize consciousness as a product of natural development of all live though from where undertook the very live, the science also still doesn't know.
If to recognize the fact that consciousness is the top echelon of beingness which just because it is capable to conscious actions, to structural change of remaining beingness, but not just to adapt to it, takes beingness on itself not only as a subordinate and supportive material, but also as a support for itself without which consciousness simply couldn't be, then consciousness should be manifested somewhere not simple for existence, which doesn't beseem to consciousness, but for development – unstoppable and the infinite in incalculable combinations of changing situations, events that is possible only in the course of interaction of consciousnesses and material objects.
Events happen only with consciousness or on eyes of consciousness. Otherwise it is any more not events, but – the senseless changes of lifeless objects leading to thermal death according to the law of non decreasing entropy. Any event is information case and information is a prerogative of consciousness. Absence of consciousness means absence of events because the consciousness is co-beingness. Deleting consciousness from beingness is loss of one-directivity of time, its irreversibility which, actually, and is created by consciousness at processing of the arriving information in order to avoid corrupting of the current reality by consciousness whereas inanimate objects are mainly characterized by material and/or energy exchange, which causes the destruction or even the a
Just time is a necessary condition for any event. The course of events can be different in various conditions, but it ca
Therefore beingness with consciousness as own top echelon develop in time infinitely, but this process isn't continuous, or smoothly, and just as "now", manifesting itself discretely and sequentially via the finite.
We know only that development of consciousness happens in conditions of Earth together with the person, human civilizations which are finite, unlike consciousness.
This means that consciousness goes far beyond human communities and only temporarily, but timely attends them. People, civilizations disappear, and the consciousness remains, having changed, having enriched and having become stronger through them.
However, how beingness together with the top echelon – by consciousness – can infinitely develop, i.e. – without any limit and the begi