Страница 2 из 2
The leaders of other confessions represent the same ritualism addicts as the leadership of Muslims and that`s why everything said about the inability of the Muslim-traditionalist Priesthood to elaborate and implement the alternative to the existing scenario has reference to them as well. Moreover, being sure that they are “true” Christians, they work for the Biblical doctrine of the world buying-up on the basis of Jewish monopoly on usury, as long as they haven`t worked out their global political doctrine for 1600 years of Christianity existence after the Nikean Gathering, because of the fact that they can`t call racial and usurious laws of the Old Testament obvious Satanism [3].
The incapability of the states (both Muslim and Western), involved in this scenario implementation, leads to the fact, that it could be broken only through the initiative of people - individuals and public organizations.
The multi-optional policy aimed at breeding civilizations conflict doesn`t have the right party.
It is impossible to avoid the conflict thinking that “we can all live in peace, based on our traditional beliefs, not interfering into the cultures of each other” for two reasons:
O Norms of social organization and ethics, appropriate for the traditional cultures, don`t coincide in all the aspects, and in some points are objectively controversial;
O There are transnational political networks in the world, that reach their goals through creation of managed conflicts on the basis of artificial actualization of different contradictions, objectively appropriate for traditional cultures.
The committed basis to prevent the above mentioned multi-optional policy could be the acceptance, that the sociological core of all Revelations, that were the source for all so-called “Abrahamian” religions, is the Idea that people themselves should create and live in prosperity on the Earth of God under God’s guidance. In this world no one will be slave to another and all the people will live in freedom, developing their individual potentials on the basis of dialogue with God while living.
So far this idea:
O Is moved to the “uncertain future” - in Judaism;
O Is denied as heresy - in Christianity;
O Is considered to be not topical - in the historically set Islam;
O Is objectively impossible on the basis of atheistic convictions in Marxism [4].
Nevertheless the Idea of creation on Earth of Kingdom Of God through the efforts of people themselves under the God guidance - is the single Idea, the distribution of which in different cultural societies can ruin the potential of described above scenario of multi-optional policy, that leads to the conflict aimed at leaving Koran in the historical legacy of the Humankind.
The problems of Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq and other countries and diasporas, the followers of the historically set Islam, can be creatively resolved only on the basis of initiatives of the people, directed at creating Kingdom of God on Earth. Beyond this global and political context these problems are unsolvable and all of these countries are fated to be “fuel” in the described above scenario.
February 12, 2010
Internal Predictor USSR
[1] The difference between the Koranic and historically set Islam is the same as the difference between the doctrine of Jesus Christ and the historically set Christianity. This statement is grounded in the books of Internal Predictor “Towards Humaneness”, ““Master and Margarita”: the anthem to demonism or the Gospel of whole-hearted faith”.
[2] To confirm this statement one can observe the last centuries of Muslim countries history, that fall behind the Western countries in science and technology development and that couldn`t elaborate more effective alternative to the Western mode of life.
[3] Deuteronomy, 15:6. Deuteronomy, 23:19, 20. Deuteronomy, 28:12 - 14. Isaiah, 60:10 - 12.
[4] This statement is grounded in the books of Internal Predictor “Towards Humanessness”, ““Master and Margarita”: the anthem to demonism? Or the the Gospel of whole-hearted faith”.