Страница 7 из 7
[30] Nowadays, in best traditions of psyche-trotskyism, S.E. Kurginyan is attempting to impose upon the society another discussion about the “Russian destiny”. The basis for identifying him as a psyche-trotskyist is the fact, that in two decades of his public political activity, he still has not desired to reveal the content of that “Red project”, for the revival of which he supposedly stands: there is no "sociology of Kurginyan" in the conceptually certain statement. There are numerous dissatisfactions with the past, the present and the future prospects, many emotions, fantasies, that substitute reliable factology in the absence of access to it (so-called "analytics"), many criticism of political rivals, sometimes substantively correct, but no exposition of the content of the project, which he serves. For example, see http://video.sibnet.ru/video556445-Proekt_KGB_SSSR_Andropova_Berii_Putina_provalilsya/ [rus] or recordings of television programs of the series "The essence of time” (2011). All that, similar to Trotsky, is aimed at manipulation of crowds, which believe without the realization of the essence of what they believe.
[31] See works of IP USSR “Muslim face of trotskyism?” (1996), «Sad heritage of Atlantis. (Trotskyism is “yesterday”, but in no way - “tomorrow)”» (1999), “The work of Trotsky under Stalin’s ba
[32] One of the brightest faces of psyche-trotskyism has revealed B.N. Yeltsin: see his talk with A.A. Zinoviev on a french TV cha
[32] In particular, from the statements of B.N. Yeltsin in that interview (statement about unwillingness to replace M.S. Gorbachev as a president of USSR, with explanation - “the future is with Russia”)it could be understood, that then he already consciously worked to destroy the USSR. However, neither in the USSR, nor in post-soviet Russian Federation this interview was ever shown on TV.
[32] Mass media state that after this “duel” with A.A. Zinoviev, B.N. Yeltsin has finally withdrawn from public debates. But A.A. Zinoviev also did not perform so well, did not "see through" the vile nature of Boris Yeltsin and drew political prospects of "perestroika" and the Soviet Union, rather different from those that have been implemented by Boris Yeltsin and his team of puppeteers. Why this discussion has been named a “duel” is unknown, since every participant talked about his own thoughts, not delved into the views of the opponent and did not try to either develop nor deny them, nor to show their inconsistency.
[33] On the other hand, Trotsky’s approval is one of the constant topics of speeches of Geidar Jemal, the chairman of Russian Islam committee of Russia.
[34] A default, in a general sense, is understood as information that is not declared, but is assumed without declaration and adds to the information declared. The information by default may contradict information declared.
[35] Many representatives of the political establishment of the US have trotskyist past (for example, see http://neofit.narod.ru/doktrina/neokon_usa_genisareckaja.html [rus]; http://www.anti-glob.ru/mnen/neotr.htm [rus] and others)
[36] See work of IP USSR “Basics of Sociology” (Part 3).
[37] The team and corporate crowd manipulation is characteristic to liberalism, in contrast to individual-leader manipulator, which historically often conceals a background team that manipulates the “leader”.
[38] See work of IP USSR “From corporatism under cover of ideas to the Sobornost in Kingdom of God on Earth” (2003).
[39] Marxism in this sense - is originally a psyche-trotskyist teaching. Claims of true marxists-trotskyists to Stalin are that he has build a policy, suppressing defaults of marxism and supplementing its declarations by his own, which reveal the defaults of Bolshevism.
[40] TV series “Highlander” about MacLeod is about that metaphorically, although wrong in many places, due to authors’ preconception in unalternativity of crowd-”elitism” in universal scale (ie even beyond Earth).
[41] If judged by his memories, then Anatoly A. Vasserman (popular journalist and political analyst and commentator) is following this path. Although, he has not walked the entire way of liberation from psyche-trotskyism (in particular, he considers himself a marxist; and marxism is originally an expression of psyche-trotskyism, due to the denial and suppression of good declaration by existing defaults), since he has not yet developed a clear understanding of psyche-trotskyism as a personal-mental as well as social phenomenon: http://www.odnako.org/blogs/show_20233/ (article “All and now. Trotskyists change colour but still stay the same”).