Добавить в цитаты Настройки чтения

Страница 322 из 340

People found to be inadmissible to Canada for reasons of serious

criminality, security, organized crime or violations of human rights will be

assessed on the grounds of the United Nations Convention against Torture

and the risk of cruel or unusual treatment or punishment.

Why we are doing it:

To ensure that there is a fair and effective procedure for assessing the risk

of return for individuals being removed from Canada.

Strengthening Enforcement

Penalties

What we are doing:

Increasing penalties for existing offences.

Creating a new offence for human trafficking.

Extending Criminal Code counterfeiting provisions (which currently apply

only to passports) to cover any immigration document or travel document

(with an exemption for refugees).

Allowing for the seizure of assets in cases of migrant smuggling and

trafficking.

Providing new authority to seize citizenship documents to prevent fraud.

Creating a new offence for people who counsel a person to misrepresent

himself or herself or to commit an offence under the Act.

Creating a new offence for the possession and laundering of proceeds from

immigration offences.

Raising the penalty to life in prison for migrant smuggling and trafficking.

Why we are doing it:

To ensure that we have the tools we need to combat organized crime and

human trafficking.

Exclusion from the Refugee Determination System

What we are doing:

Barring access to serious criminals, people who present security risks,

organizers of criminal operations, or violators of human rights. A "serious

criminal" is defined as someone who was convicted of an offence punishable

by 10 years or more and who has received a sentence of 2 years or more in

Canada. People convicted of an offence punishable by 10 years or more

outside Canada will only be excluded if the Minister finds them to be a

danger to the public.

Why we are doing it:

To prevent abuse of the refugee protection system.

Eliminating Appeals

What we are doing:

Eliminating appeals to the Immigration Appeal Division for serious criminals,

people who present security risks, members of criminal organizations and

war criminals. There will remain recourse to judicial review with leave by the

Federal Court.

Why we are doing it:

To ensure that we can remove serious criminals and people who pose a

security threat to Canada without delay.

Suspension of a Refugee Claim

What it is:

The ability to suspend a person's application for protection before the IRB if

he or she has been charged with a crime. The claim would be suspended

until the courts have rendered a decision on the case.

Why we are doing it:

To prevent abuse of the system by people who come to Canada not

because they need protection but because they intend to engage in crime.

Repeat Claims

What we are doing:

Extending the period after which a new claim can be made from 90 days to

six months.

Why we are doing it:

To avoid "revolving door" situations where failed refugee claimants return to

Canada and make multiple claims.

Detention and Day Parole

What we are doing:

Excluding incarcerated foreign criminals under removal order from day

parole.

Why we are doing it:

It is inconsistent to integrate individuals into Canadian society who are to be

deported on completion of their sentence.





Streamlined Security Certificate Process

What we are doing:

Applying to permanent residents the security certificate process that

currently applies only to non-permanent residents. The process requires the

signatures of two ministers to the effect that the person is inadmissible on

grounds of security, and a review of the certificate by a Federal Court judge.

Why we are doing it:

To make it easier to remove permanent residents who pose a serious threat

to national security.

New Inadmissibility Classes

What they are:

Two new classes of people who will be inadmissible to Canada: (1) people

subject to travel sanctions imposed by Canada as a member of an

international organization such as the United Nations; (2) people who

committed fraud or misrepresentation on an immigration application will be

inadmissible for 2 years.

Why we are doing it:

To strengthen our ability to enforce international sanctions.

To prevent immigration to Canada through fraudulent means.

Backgrounder # 3

Milestones On the Road to New Legislation

Since 1996, the Government of Canada has been reviewing immigration and

refugee policy and legislation with a view to fundamental policy reform and the

introduction of new legislation.

The comprehensive review process that has been under way since has involved a

significant number of consultations with many different groups and interests as well

as with individual Canadians. Ministers have been discussing immigration reform

with Canadians for more than four years.

This process has included:

The appointment of a Legislative Review Advisory Group (LRAG) in 1996

commenced a major consultation process both by LRAG and by the

government on their report, Not Just Numbers, in 1998.

A Red Book commitment in 1997 and 2000 to streamline and update the

immigration/refugee system, which promised to implement changes to

make Canada's immigration system simpler, more effective, and more

easily understood.

The release of the White Paper, Building on a Strong Foundation for the

21st Century: New Directions for Immigration and Refugee Policy and

Legislation in January 1999;

Consultations on the White Paper with Canadians, provinces and territories,

non-government organizations, the legal community, special interest

groups, and the business sector throughout 1999;

Immigration commitments in the 1999 Throne Speech, Budget 2000 and

2001 Throne Speech; including the 2001 Throne Speech commitment to

re-introduce legislation to streamline and improve the immigration system.

Consultations leading up to the Standing Committee Report of March 22,

2000 entitled Refugee Protection and Border Security: Striking a Balance;

and

The introduction of the new Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (Bill

C-31 Bill C- ) in 2000 and 2001.

General agreement on fundamentals

There is general agreement that Canada needs a new Act that is simpler, more

effective, and more easily understood. Canadians want to stop abuse of our

immigration and refugee system and protect Canada's borders.

They want a system that is fair, effective, and respectful of Canada's humanitarian

traditions and international commitments in a world of increasing migration

pressures.

They also agree that Canada needs immigrants to contribute to Canada's

economic growth and prosperity. The business community needs access to the

highly skilled global workforce. Canadians recognize that immigration is largely

responsible for Canada's rich and diverse culture, and is a key advantage in the

global economy.

Canadians want a system that reflects our traditions of family reunification and

family values, honours our history of compassion for refugees needing a safe

haven, and contains selection criteria for immigrants that will ensure that

newcomers contribute Canada's economic and social fabric.

Immigration has proved to be a successful economic, social and cultural strategy