Страница 2 из 4
If Saakashvili regime, not understanding the algorithmic of Georgia disintegration inertly going during last 20 years, got used to speeding-up this process — these are problems of Saakashvili and Georgian “elite” at all.
Besides that, these are problems of Saakashvili regime’s transatlantic sponsors and curators.
The last circumstance binds to move on global level examination of events at South Ossetia on August 8--12, 2008.
2.3. Global level of examination
Without support from USA post-Soviet Georgia would disintegrated long ago under influence of its internal algorithmic. But such variant doesn’t suit to USA now and before. Also the USA are not suited with preservation of territorial integrity of Russia and moreover — with reintegration processes on former-USSR territory; under certain conditions stipulated mostly by Russia's policy, some nations which never were members of Russian empire or the USSR, from both Europe and Asia may join in these processes.
From the begi
«…we are entirely within our own rights, and need feel no sense of guilt, in working for the destruction of concepts inconsistent with world peace and stability and for their replacement by ones of tolerance and international collaboration. It is not our business to calculate the internal developments to which the adoption of such concepts might lead in another country, nor need we feel that we have any responsibility for those developments.… (Printed in bold while quoting by us: this — is declaration of amorality in US' policy, which [i.e. amorality] is not inexcusable for true democracy).»
Till today the U.S. politics moves in cha
According to global policy principles, which USA executes after 1945, for USA bosses Georgia is, first of all, the position for “rapid deployment forces” and elements of USA global military infrastructure deployment. But USA can’t use this region, until there are Russian troops on Georgian territory, inherited from the USSR.
In this part petty-parasitic interests of Georgian “elite” on suppression of Georgian national minorities “separatism” and Russian peacemaking contingent withdrawal out of Georgia's borders coincide with USA' interests.
“Blitzkrieg”, to which USA supposedly trained Georgian Army, hasn’t achieved its goals ((1) to change administrations in “insurgent regions”; or (2) to involve Russia into a protracted war). I.e. USA enticed Saakashvili to the first variant, but really prepared the second variant.
Nor the first, nor the second really happened.
On the one hand it displeases USA and stirs up Saakashvili’s embarrassment close to psychic frustration, and on the other hand, military-political Russia’s victory provokes enthusiasm of those society sections both in Russia and abroad, which, if put it mildly, have little liking of the USA for its politics mendacity and dissimulation.
Saakashvili himself and his regime at present time are exclusively Georgian internal problems depended on that post-Soviet Georgia has no true sovereignty; and there are Georgians who have to solve these problems, but not at the expense of Ossetians, Abkhazians or Russians.
Moreover, there is an opinion that USA intended to use Georgian territory in pla
some of them design war on Iran with Georgian participation and with Ukrainian air defence subunits for defending objectives at Georgian territory,
and others, in order to ruin this war (using “fighting fire on fire” method) forestally organize Georgia military venture at S. Ossetia, thus after armed conflict with Russia Georgia becomes unsuitable for using in USA war against Iran.
2.4. “Tough patriots”: in Russia and in USA
However, side by side with this, not all “true patriots” in Russia understand that this Russian military-politic victory doesn’t “appear out of the blue” or “happen by itself” to Dmitry Medvedev’s and Vladimir Putin’s delight and despite of their intentions, which, – according to opinion of “true patriots”, – think only about how to enter “the world association” by themselves and to finally “surrender Russia to their bosses from the West”. This Russian military-political victory was made ready namely by post-Yeltsin regime, which represents the result of many years purposeful activity of one of internal KGB[16] mafia, which created present regime at post-Yeltsin Russia.
Generally speaking, in order to be true patriot, but not a “tough patriot”, it is necessary to cultivate global-strategic thinking.
“Tough patriots” trouble and danger for people is instantly that according to lack of global-strategic thinking they easily may be involved in this or that “trickery” in cha
Essentially this became nervousness subject of Zbignew Brzezinski – “elite”-patriotic American with Polish roots US national security advisor to J. Carter, and also hater of Russia and follower of US complete world dominion conception. While having global-strategic thinking, Brzezinski for many years is displeased with George W. Bush’s administration policy.
“Bush’s and his encirclement’s nearsighted and non-professional actions at world arena threaten to follow USA to break-up”
“Administration’s recklessness will bring politic benefits to USA main geopolitical r i vals – Russia and China”
Even now Zbignew doesn’t change these estimations maiden in 2005.
And though Zbignew Brzezinski as US “elite” patriot is right in his estimations of George Bush Junior administration policy consequences, but Bush’s administration carries out namely that policy, because it is also a puppet – not concerning some third world power, but concerning “world backstage – world hidden forces”. “World backstage” works out on global scale: for this purpose USA have to create global significance revolutionary force – “Islamic” caliphate, – to begin with Afro-Eurasian and primarily nuclear-armed (Pakistan has nuclear weapon); and to let this psycho-Trotskyist [i.e. revolutionary; from the term “permanent revolution” by Lev Trotsky] “caliphate” appear, it is necessary to bring down states of traditional Islam — George W. Bush administration is obliged to do this after September 11, 2001 (9/11). The administration is doing it with obstinacy, which may be used to better things, and despite of common Americans wishes, which don't understand what is going on and majority of them think that Bush just “behaves in a queer way” according to his weak-mindedness and alcoholic past.
3. Russia’s main problem
However, in the history of centuries-old battle for development of originality of multinational Rus’ Civilization military-politic victory over USA at South Ossetia on August 2008 as to its importance and long-term consequences is just one of many “local importance” fights. And itself it is not rather important, if the basis of Russia' policy has no global strategy of victory and equally no own conception of globalization.