Страница 2 из 3
7. The tendency for identification of V.V.Putin with A.Hitler and Russia with Third Reich respectively is dominating in “EU-2”-members and USA propaganda in view of Russia' relation to Nazi coup in Ukraine, which was made with participation of intelligence agencies from number of European (“EU-2”) countries and the USA (scenarios development, activists training, special forces secret participation in provocations and the like).
8. The company on re-writing of history of Second World War (WWII) and history of Russia-USSR-Russia and on propaganda of new version of history with mass-media and education system was started. The essence of history rethinking by West:
the USSR and Third Reich — are equally totalitarian, fascist regimes, which had been threaten for all mankind freedom.
J.Stalin with his aggressive aspirations and misanthropy prepared so-called “liberation campaign” of Red Army to Europe.
A.Hitler (though he wasn't right in his relations to Jews, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Austria and other European countries occupied by Third Reich) was compelled to start “preventive war” against the USSR, because of J.Stalin' hypocritical policy and preparation of Red Army “liberation campaign” to Europe[8].
There was no “European Union-1”, but there were different European countries occupied by Third Reich. Resistance (supported by Great Britain) actively functioned in these countries.
At Third Reich (and also at SS) there was its own anti-totalitarian underground. “SS European Charter” (1944) appeared as a result of its activity. Therefore its not correct to “paint all SS-mans with black color”: there were worthy peoplу, who became hostages of the circumstances created by Hitler and Stalin.
USA and Great Britain made a decisive contribution to defeating of Third Reich and releasing European nations from hitlerism by crushing Hitlerite strategy of world supremacy gain with battles in Africa (operations against Rommel' army), Allied invasion of Italy (1943), Battle of Normandy (1944), rout of Japan (global-strategic Reich' ally) at Pacific.
There was so-called “Eastern Front”, but it has exclusively “tactical” value: its value is represented big because of its huge extent, but it wasn't globally strategically critic, because “Eastern Front” passed only on USSR territory and until the end of 1944 was on considerable removal from Third Reich territory, without making any impact on its life (men in the street are not obligatory to know that “Eastern Front” provided 80% Wehrmacht irrecoverable attrition). Soviet propaganda unfairly inflated its value along with belittling of the USSR anti-Hitlerite coalition allies role. Nowadays V.V.Putin's regime pursues the same policy of inflating “Eastern Front” value, belittling Allies role and history fabrication: see what N.V.Starikov, A.G.Dugin, S.E.Kurginyan, A.A.Prokhanov and other ideologists and analysts of “patriotic” sense (nuts about world conspiracy theories) tell and write about Great Britain' role in the history.
Only British air forces and diversionary units made strategic impact directly on Third Reich (while at “Eastern Front” there were combats of tactical value). US strategic air force joined this activity at the final stage of war. And it was critic factor, because exactly diversionary units destroyed heavy water factory in Norway (occupied by Third Reich). It didn't allow Hitler to plaster with nuclear weapon on his enemies including USSR. It's also necessary not to forget about lend-lease (supply from Great Britain and the USA to the USSR with food, oil and materiel), without which USSR would be crushed. “The Battle for the Atlantic (1939-1945) – won by US and British fleets – gets special role in the light of such lend-lease importance. Because deliveries of manifold products by foremost British and American economies to the USSR under lend-lease would be impossible without this victory. But Russians, as always, are unthankful, though the contribution of Russians to victory over Third Reich is insignificant, because there were no any “Russian fronts” in Red Army, but “Ukrainian”, “Belorussian”, “Baltic”.
9. Liberals from Russia will a
Rus'-Russia-USSR-Russia civilization — has its own mission, which is unacceptable for sachems and masters of Biblical project. So they lie and get furious.
Internal Predictor of the USSR
March 17-22, 2015
Translated by COB supporters
April 3-21, 2015
Original text in Russian:
[1]
Full poem (in Russian and Spanish):
[2]
Convoy PQ-17, betrayed by Admiralty, delaying with opening of Western Front' second-phase until June 1944 and so on.
[3] Military formations from Italy, Romania, Hungary, Spain and Finland were at war with USSR. European economy acted for Third Reich needs. «Resistance» from majority of occupied European countries and from Third Reich' allies — according to its size and strength of combat actions against Nazi and collaborative regimes is disparate with Soviet partisans and resistant movement in occupied Soviet territories. After Munich agreement Poland was in fact Third Reich ally, which developed in cooperative extermination of Czechoslovakia by armies of Germany, Poland and Hungary. Polish government in exile was juridically at war state with the USSR until July 30, 1941. After USSR and polish government in exile signed a treaty of cooperation (July 30, 1941) – polish military formations were formed at USSR territory (Anders' Army). But Poland avoided Anders' Army action at Soviet-German front, and the army was removed from USSR to Iran before the Stalingrad Battle. Polish People's Army was formed at USSR territory in 1943 from those Poles and Soviet citizens of polish ethnic origin, who have been evaded from entry into Ander's Army.
[4] See: , ,
[5] «Official explanation for F.Roosevelt' death — massive cerebral hemorrhage (stroke). However his personal doctor Dr. McIntire testified that none signs of cerebral arteries sclerosis were found during president's regular medical examinations. I think, you'll not be surprise to know that no autopsy was made.
Besides that, as soon as 1948 the book “The Strange Death of Franklin D. Roosevelt” by E. Josephson () told details of president' death along with really sensational, yet confirmed in detail, information about president' entourage, in which hands the president was. According to Josephson, reasons for president' entourage not to allow autopsy and exposure of the body for last respects aren't subjects to doubts: according to testimony of priest, who was at Warm Springs, the president was killed with a bullet to a nape, apparently exploding, which disfigured all face after an exit from skull. Eleanor Roosevelt – First Lady of US – explained body exposure withdrawal: this supposedly “it was not in Roosevelt family tradition”. Without saying about that the president of the state isn't subject of “family tradition”, it wasn't true: Sara Roosevelt' body (president' mother) was, for example, exposured for last respects, according to her son order. Having forgotten about this statement, madame Roosevelt disproved herself in “Saturday Evening Post” magazine (February 8, 1958), when writing, that the next day after inhumation at Hyde Park her son James found in safe president' personal instructions on a case of his death: to exposure his body at the US Capitol. As she wrote, “oddly” all other president' posthumous orders, besides that one, were executed literally...» (Golikov A.A. Franklin Roosevelt. Secret of president' death (in Russian): ).