Gold Coast

As for Ethel, I couldn't get a fix on her opinion of the Bellarosas or our relationship with them. She seemed noncommittal, almost non-judgemental for a change. I suspect that this was because she couldn't fit the Bellarosas into her theory of class struggle. Socialist doctrine, I think, is somewhat vague on the subject of criminals, and Ethel gets most of her opinions from nineteenth-century radicals who believed that the oppressive capitalist system created crime and criminals. So, perhaps Ethel was wrestling with the idea that Frank Bellarosa was a victim of free enterprise rather than one of its beneficiaries. If Ethel and I agree on anything, it is probably Mark Twain's observation that "there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress."

Anyway, there was one day when I was in the city and I had to reach Susan to ask her if she could come into Manhattan to join me for di

The fact was, I still didn't have the Bellarosas' phone number, and Susan said she didn't either. I had noticed, when I was at Alhambra, and Susan confirmed, that none of the telephones there have the phone numbers written on the instruments. This was good security, of course, and I'd seen that in other great houses, as a precaution against the occasional servant, repairman, or the like jotting down the phone numbers of the rich and famous. Late that evening, upon returning home after my di

"Yes, I got the messages on my machine and from Ethel." I never ask "Where were you?" because if I did, then she would start asking, "Where were you? – which leads to "Who were you with and what were you doing?" What could be more lower-middle-class than asking your spouse to account for his or her day or evening? That's probably how Sally A

She shrugged. "I don't have any reason to call them. I suppose you could just send George."

I think Susan was missing my point. I responded, "George is not always available. Perhaps you can get the Bellarosas' phone number, Susan. I'm quite sure you will have some reason to call them someday." "I don't think so. I just come and go as I please. If I have to leave a message, I leave it with Anthony, Vi

"Who, may I ask, are Anthony, Vi

"You've met Anthony – the gatekeeper. Vi

"Lee is a woman. I see. And what does poor Vi

"That's interesting." What was even more interesting, I thought, was that Lady Stanhope seemed to find these Damon Runyon characters simpatico. But I, narrow-minded, upper-middle-class John Sutter, was not so tolerant. I suggested, "Perhaps we should introduce Anthony, Vi

Getting no response, I went back to my main point and said, "But surely, Susan, on a dark and stormy night, it might be easier to call Alhambra than to go to the gatehouse and interrupt something."

"Look, John, if you want the phone number, you ask for it. How were the Petersons?"

"They were very sorry they missed you." The question of the telephone number was now in my court, where it would stay. Do you see what I mean about Susan's unreasonableness? Stubbor

Anyway, regarding the Bellarosas' phone number, I didn't really want it, except for those rare occasions when I needed to reach Susan, who seemed to have become part of the royal court at Alhambra. But the fact that Bellarosa hadn't called, written, sent word, or divulged his phone number to me confirmed in my mind that we had no lawyer/client relationship, either implied or inferred. And the next time he called me, I resolved that I would tell him that in no uncertain terms. Unfortunately, Fate, which had always been kind to me in the past, was pissed off at me for some reason and intervened again to push me into Bellarosa's deadly embrace.

I was busy at work, especially in my Manhattan office. My practice has as much to do with money as it does with law. Or to be more precise, my clients want to know how to legally keep their money out of the hands of the government. This spirited contest between the taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service has been going on since the very moment Congress passed the income tax amendment in 1913. In recent years, because of people like me, the taxpayer has actually won a few rounds.

The result of this prolonged conflict has been the creation of a large and thriving tax industry, of which I and my firm are important players. My clients are mostly people or heirs to people who were hit hard in 1929, and those who recovered faced income tax rates that reached ninety percent by the 1950s. Many of these people, sophisticated in other ways, were unprepared for the onslaught of income redistribution from Washington. Some, in an idiotic display of guilt and altruism, even saw it as just and fair, like Susan's grandfather, who was prepared to give half his money to the American people. But when it got to be more than half, some of these socially progressive millionaires began to feel the pinch. It also became obvious that the few dollars of tax money that did get down to the people were getting to the wrong people for the wrong reasons. And so, in a less sophisticated age, even those of my firm's clients who knew how to make money in the worst of times didn't know how to keep it from the government in the best of times. But they've seen the light, and they don't intend for this to happen again, for this is the age of greed, and of looking out for Number One. And through a process of social Darwinism, we have all evolved into specialized species who can smell the danger of a new tax law hatched on Capitol Hill all the way to Wall Street.

These people, my clients, hire me to be certain that they are not going to go to jail if they or their financial pla