Добавить в цитаты Настройки чтения

Страница 12 из 22

Part 5. The Laws of Creation. The True Boundaries of Self

Tell me, how did duality come into being?

Separation. It began with the separation of God from within God. A part of God separated itself as an island and stood opposite God so that He could perceive this part of Himself. But in becoming an island of God, this part began to delve into the center of itself. And the further it delved into its own center, the more it distanced itself from the True God, the more it forgot its co

You said that the deeper the being delved into itself, the more it lost its co

That’s a linear perception. When the Particle of God began to delve into itself and distance itself from the True God, it started to create and unfold entire worlds within itself since it originally possessed all the qualities of the Creator.

And these unfolded worlds within itself became its external world, while the facets of the Particle of God’s co

The creation of space consists of unfolding a point of potential. There is the Particle of God as an island of God. It strives into itself and unfolds its creations and spaces within itself. This is the very inversion you’ve been told about. By unfolding the created spaces within itself, the Particle of God unfolds Points of Potentials of Creation, and thus the inversion of space occurs from outside God into the Particle of God.

And the boundary of contact with God folds into the i

Very confusing. What happened next?

Next, the Particle of God began to allocate islands of itself, which were opposite it, so that it could observe and perceive them. And so the second degree of separation arose. The first, as you remember, was the separation of the Particle of God outside of God so that He could observe it. The second is the separation of a part of the Particle of God outside of this Particle so that it could observe this part of itself. And so on to infinity.

But doesn’t that mean that God can only observe a part of the Particle of God through this Particle of God?

Exactly. And that is why God ca

What kind of free will is that if God simply ca

Think about it. This is how the cause-and-effect relationship was born. That is, a part of the Particle of God became the effect, and the Particle of God was the cause of the emergence of this part.

And God could observe parts of Himself only through the prism of these parts, and this is the reflection and movement of Divine Light inward. Everything is similar.

You said that a part of God separated outside of God. Was this part you? Does that mean we are all parts of your Particle?

Yes, that’s correct. But alongside you, other parts of God also separated, and this was what is called the rebellion of the Angels. Did these parts of God also unfold their worlds within themselves?

Yes, the universe is diverse. They created other worlds and systems in their own image and likeness.

Do these worlds intersect?

Everything that has similarity intersects. If you are a millionth reflection of me, then what is your degree of similarity with the millionth reflection of another creator? Do you understand? He and I are particles of God, and in this, we are similar, but then we began to create worlds within ourselves in our own likeness. “In our own likeness” means from ourselves and within ourselves.

But creative impulses are different; just as one artist’s painting is unlike another’s, so the degree of similarity of our creations varies. You have realist artists who try to reflect what they see traditionally. But then cubists and impressionists appear, and other paintings and other creations emerge. This is the prism of reflection. How similar is Malevich’s square to the world around you?

But what exactly is free will?

In the ability to create. And in separation. The True God separated Parts of Himself and gave them the ability to also create parts of themselves, granting them the freedom to create. He also realized that if He were to interfere with the creations of His parts, the impulse of His interference would reach the point of intervention distorted, as it would pass through layers of distortion. And God understood that His interference would not be as He intended. Thus, the Law of Non-Intervention was born. These two laws are co

Do we perceive this as some kind of gift, or is it merely a forced measure?

A gift is something that is given without expecting anything in return. Isn’t this a gift from God to you and all your parts?

Alright. But how did duality come into being? Light and dark, high and low, male and female?





Don’t rush. I am trying to explain this to you. There are still many conversations ahead.

Creation formed, and the laws of creation were also formed. And the Law of Likeness emerged. Nothing is like anything else because everything is a distortion. And everything is like everything else because it has a single Source and a single essence.

If everything is God, then everything is similar. But there are differences in similarity. And the Particles of God began to interact according to the degree of likeness. And thus, the Poles of Likeness began to arise.

Look. At the border with God, a Particle of God is similar to God, but the deeper it delves into its own center through its creations, the more this similarity is distorted. This is the first two poles of likeness, or the poles of duality: I and God.

The second pair of poles of duality: I and a part of me. And so on.

But the parts of me within me are also different. And their creations are different.

And what about the female and male? How did this distinction come about?

In the same way. Some parts of God adjusted their prisms of perception of God to a certain degree of refraction of His Light. And the degrees of creation were different: passive and active degrees of creation.

What does this mean?

I am searching for words within you. What is active creation? It is the creation of something whose degree of likeness to you is low, meaning something more distinct from you, more distorted. Accordingly, passive creation is the creation of something close and similar to you. And at the same time, this is a kind of Span of Creation. That is, you can create by diving into yourself and distancing yourself from yourself.

Don’t try to understand this linearly; learn to think multidimensionally. To prevent confusion, let’s define that the distinction of Yourself is the closeness to God, or that very border with God that is within you. The further you distance yourself from God in your creations, the more actively you create, the more you create by expanding yourself outward from within. The less you distance yourself from God, the more you immerse yourself in your creation, and the more passively you create. But all of this is conditional because it all happens within you, and in the active part of creation, you simply unfold, turn a part of yourself outward from within.

Those who read our conversations say that all of this is very complex.

Don’t think about others. Try to understand and remember for yourself. Those who wish to understand will comprehend and realize.

Look. The more you create, the more various creations appear within you. Some of them are active, and some of them are passive creations. And according to the Law of Likeness, they polarize, meaning the like attracts the like. And so, within you, two poles are formed: the pole of active creation and the pole of passive creation. Depending on which of your creations prevail within you, your affiliation with the male or female type of perception is determined.

You have a concept: unity as the struggle of opposites. Replace the word “struggle” with “interaction,” and you will get the correct reflection.

But why did opposition arise?

Masculine energy, being active, initiated this opposition. The active aspect represents a greater degree of separation from God; the further the separation, the stronger the illusion of being separate. Those parts of the particles of God that began to create actively and distanced themselves from God to a greater degree, thereby expanded themselves into external worlds. And the more they expanded outwardly, the further they distanced themselves from God, the more they considered themselves separate, and the more they perceived their external worlds as reality, eventually believing that the boundaries of their created external worlds were the true boundaries of themselves.

Then they decided that they were defined not by their i

Look. Your physical body and the existing external reality perceived by you are your active creation. You begin to perceive your boundaries as the outline of your physical body and fight for your physical inviolability. But you do not realize that these boundaries are an illusion. Your true boundary is the one that separates you from God, and it is located within you. And if you turn your creation inward, you will begin to return to God within yourself, creating other magical worlds along the way. And this is passive creation.

But don’t we all actively create the external perceived worlds? Does that mean we are all men?

You are talking about the physical body. When every morning you wake up and create the world perceived by you within the part of yourself, you create actively, distancing yourself from the true boundaries of yourself, and you feel your separation from God. And many of you become so engrossed in this external creation of yourselves that you consider it the boundary of your true self. But when you return to God within yourself, to me, to Kuthumi, to all your parts within yourself, you interact with us through your true boundaries, through that which separates you from the True God. And then you create passively.

So, everything I see around me is my external creation of myself? And everything I feel within me is my internal creation of myself? But then, are you also my internal creation?

You could say that.

So, what yogis see when they travel through astral worlds is simply their internal creation? And it doesn’t actually exist?