Страница 10 из 98

A Call for armed insurrection

There are among our enemies and such that will simply humiliate you and contemptuously call «young morons».For example, Dmitry Puchkov, Nikolai Starykov, Sergey Kurginyan are such.Such people can disguise themselves as leftists, as Puchkov does, they can also show their right self, as the Starykov does. The meaning of their statements and the general proposed program does not change from this: it is necessary to obey and not to rebel, because all those who decide to rebel are traitors who receive money from the CIA, State Department, British or Israeli intelligence. These people are trying to explain to us that all revolutions, starting with the Netherlands, are organized by the State Department.Some of them, – like, for example, Puchkov, – can hide behind the Soviet past and even scold the current order, without changing the essence of their program. They say that it is enough only to scold Chubais and praise the USSR, and all the problems of the country will someday disappear. Some (Konstantin Semin, for example) say that, they say, «Resovietization» will happen soon.They claim that our authorities will take, polish, and restore the USSR. Of course, only the most unsung idiots can believe in this. Never before has there been such a thing that rich and bureaucrats took, and voluntarily gave up all their wealth, from all their power.And not under the threat of revolution, but simply out of the kindness of the soul. Of course, all such «theories» exist only to justify their own corruption.These people understand that the Soviet Union was created by the efforts of terrorists and guerrillas, and not at all loyal ideologues, such as Both Puchkov and Semin. Such people love both Stalin and Dzerzhinsky, but you ask these amateurs: «Why?». They say: «Stalin suppressed the opposition, shot, punished, sent to a concentration camp.». You know, I love Stalin too.And I love Dzerzhinsky. But I love them for something else. For what other lovers of Stalin and Dzerzhinsky often forget. Dzerzhinsky, as well as Stalin, was a revolutionary, an irreconcilable fighter with the government. And to speak in a modern way, – a terrorist and an extremist! And he was in prison! Goblin calls the «young morons» of modern young people who decided to rebel against the government.At the same time, he does not like the government too much, being an ardent critic of him, but, while condemning people for the fact that they would like to change the modern situation for the better. Interestingly, Goblin even knows that Stalin became a revolutionary in fifteen years?! Is he a «young moron»now? It turns out that it is so! But why then Goblin respects Stalin to the impossibility?! Here is one of two: whether Puchkov knows nothing about his idol, or he deliberately lies and hypocrites. If the first of these statements is true, goblin is a fool. If the second is true, he is a bastard. Anyway, you can't trust this guy. Fools and dads to believe – is like a whip himself.

We still have citizens who claim that all terrorists are losers. It's also a mere lie.The sapatista movement in Chiapas was led by subcommander Marcos, a young and promising professor at the University of Mexico. The «Red Army Faction» was headed by Ulrika Meinhof. First of all, I'll tell you that she was beautiful. She was not only a very beautiful girl, but also a popular journalist: her articles were printed by the largest newspapers and magazines, and her books were published in millions of copies. However, she decided to become a terrorist. The Italian «Red Brigades» consisted of dozens of the most prominent intellectuals, which are not required to list now.

We also have a myth that nothing can be achieved by partisanship, but moderate reforms can be achieved. This, of course, is also nonsense. Never before have great social transformations been made through reform. In Europe, until recently there were many reformist «social-democratic» parties, which all said: «We, they say, against terror, against revolutions! We are for very, very moderate progress!». Of course, these parties did not achieve anything in the end. Well, socially, they didn't. But in the sense of personal enrichment very much even achieved: the leaders of these parties now drive cars with personal drivers, have villas on the Cote d'Azur and bank accounts somewhere in the Cayman Islands. French socialists and so-called «Eurocommunists» promised to build socialism in France with the help of reforms. The socialists in Italy and the German Social Democrats said the same. And whathave they achieved with their «moderate reforms»? Is socialism built in France? And in Italy? And in Germany? You all know that there is no socialism there. Moreover, no steps in the direction to it are also not visible. In Europe, spending on education and medicine is being cut everywhere, university budgetplaces are being cut, unemployment benefits are being abolished, social housing is being demolished, trade unions are being ba