Страница 11 из 12
Source: M. Baigent, Ancient Traces: Mysteries in Ancient and Early History.
Eksmo. Moscow, 2004. ISBN 5-699-04989-4. Page 16.
Traces of bare feet similar to traces of the person, were found in 1835 after the heavy pouring rains near of Carson in the State of Nevada (USA). They were being printed in Triassic sandstones with the age from 213 to 248 million years. Footprints of humans or human-like creatures were also found in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Spain, Georgia, China, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Tanzania, South Africa, Australia and several other countries.
Source: dopotopa.com
Certainly, the last artifacts can be reflection of activity of technological civilizations at early stages of development (primitive-communal system), but, similarly, they can be and by confirmation of existence of the civilizations which formed on ruins of technological civilizations both have partially kept remnants of technologies and some bases of culture of these civilizations.
The main thing is a fact of existence during the particular periods throughout hundred millions years on a planet of reasonable civilizations from communities of the same people, as well as we.
It is possible to get acquainted with much more extensive collection of different artifacts in my book: Nizovtsev Yu. M. Our true life is endless. Chapter 6. 2016. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: ASIN: B01M1OJ041, Amazon. Yury Nizovtsev.
Part III. Secrets
1. Where Homo sapiens among unreasonable and brainless undertook from?
If summarized the explanation of Darwin's evolutionary theory supporters of the conversion of reflex operating primates into conscious operating person, it is as follows.
They point out that any higher animals did not have the ability to conceptual thinking, i.e. to the formation of abstract representations about subjects, which summarizes the basic properties of concrete things. The process of thinking for animals if it is possible to speak about that, is always concrete, the process of thinking for a person can be the abstract, generalizing, conceptual, logical. Thanks to ability to conceptual thinking, the person understands that he does, and understands the world. The second main difference is that the person possesses the speech. Animals can have very developed system of communication by transmitted signals but only the person has the second signal system – communication through words. It is supposed in natural sciences that the speech came from the sounds uttered during the work which then became common in the course of joint work. In the same way a mind could occur in the process of social labor gradually.
Evolutionists believe that Darwin's theory has received genetic confirmation in the XX century, since from all the animals the chimpanzee genome upon the genetic apparatus is the closest to human. This genome is identical to the person genome on 99%.
We note with his hand, that, as it is paradoxical, but both arguments of evolutionists: labor created the person; the person is genetically almost indistinguishable from chimpanzees, actually lead to the opposite conclusion.
Themselves biologists say that the animal's behavior represents one of forms of functioning of its organism. The structure of the organism determines the needs of animals and their behavior programs. Any animal is born as a being endowed by the set of instincts. Instincts provide its adaptability to environmental conditions and limit individual variations of the behavior.
The situation is different with a human. All people which have lived on Earth the last 35 – 40 thousand years belong to the same type (Homo sapiens).
Thus, for years of change of organisms from the simplest to the primates the reflex system of their reaction to influence of the environment remained actually the same. In other words, programs of their actions are similar each other.
And suddenly, for slight term, in a result of rather short-term influence of external conditions, some species of primates acquired consciousness and self-consciousness, while others have remained by monkeys. And we do not know what out of these monkeys "worked" more. Now the theory of Darwin is recognized, at least, disputable just because to explain how the monkey evolved into the person from a position of modern science is not possible.
Obviously, for the emergence of consciousness in primates had to be occurred certain fundamental internal changes which were not for all time of existence of organisms on the planet. What are these changes, if the person by its appearance, the structure of organs and even the structure of a genome is very close to a chimpanzee?
It is possible to state the following: only change of the carrier-genome, programmed to the reflex "unconscious" activity on the carrier-genome programmed on conscious activity, can be as such internal change, in which a living creature is able to separate of itself from the environment, aware of itself as separate that means the emergence of self-consciousness.
Therefore, the transformation of the most perfect primate – it could be a chimpanzee or even more perfect primate – in the human prototype is possible only as a result of similar program change. Apparently, under this new program was remodeled the chimpanzee genome or the genome of a similar monkey. It is known that this genome coincides with a genome of the person on 99 %. This circumstance simply facilitates case technically.
One of hypotheses believes that the closest human ancestor was a monkey lagoon from Ethiopia. She had less indumentum, she swam well. A significant part of the day she was walking vertically. She had "lowered larynx", the appearance of which, apparently, she is obliged to the semi-aquatic lifestyle. The important thing is that the similar larynx gives the chance to control respiration and, as a result, lets ability to speak.
After similar reorganization the symbiosis of the resulting creature and individual consciousness – another, higher level than the level of the animal consciousness, becomes possible. This procedure also enables to evince the renewed consciousness, characterized by self-consciousness, by this being. Everything else: the ability to work together with the tribe, co
Thus, we can say that a being, which is capable only for unconscious actions, has one program, but a conscious being (having self-consciousness) has another program – more complex: this program enables to the living being quickly to be reconstructed, it enables to train itself, to project the actions on the future, it allows to process the results for the subsequent adjustment, using already saved up memory from a much bigger database, than at primates.
In other words, the new program allows the being to look at itself from the outside, i.e. to separate of itself from the environment, to which it was previously forced only to adapt. Thereby this new being gains additional feature – purposefully to change the environment, and along with that to change of itself consciously.