Economic crisis: who is to blame and what to do

Through the skulls of our ancestors, with the help of the comparison of their brain on different levels of evolution, through the comparison of the brain of monkey and human and through other methods the scientists revealed the parts of the brain that are responsible for socialization. These are the frontal areas of the brain. Along with the socialization these parts are responsible for the real-imaginative forecasting that was necessary for hunting.

Thus, there is the opinion of paleontologists that the relations between the domain experts and social motivators for thousands of years defined the main tendencies of development of our intellect, brain, our evolution. Those ancestors of people who walked not the way of the submission to circumstances of socialization, but developed their individual abilities just were extinct. The Neanderthals gave their place to Cro-Magnons.

There are facts such as the increasing of the frontal areas of the brain and decrease of the brain itself in the process of human evolution. But the mass of the female brain is always smaller than the male. These differences are not constant and depend on ethnic characteristics (see: Takahashi, Suzuki, 1961.). In addition, a large part of the evolution of the human brain was held in the period of matriarchy and it does not deny the thoughts expressed by S. Saveliev, but simply clarifies them.

Yes, women played the decisive role in the formation of a tribe and in the socialization process. They caught the slightest reaction of the child since its birth, thereby keeping him alive. Their biological function – the birth and procreation – gave them the undeniable advantages in understanding, in feeling of a human being and in the management of them not through force but through empathy, through the feeling of another person, through empathy with him or her. Woman gets used to the child, and she has the more developed ability to do this than a man. Therefore it is possible to suppose with a high degree of certainty that social motivators of that time were with the characteristics of empathic individuals.

Reducing of the weight of the brain took place also for the reason that human changed in two directions – in the direction of increasing of the frontal lobe (this is a purely male part of the brain, it is largely responsible for the success of the hunt), and towards the development of empathy, feelings of other people, for example in the direction of copying the features of the female brain. In their evolution our ancestors took the best both from men and from women. Of course, in different nations the ratio of male and female in the brain was formed in different ways. Each ethnic group has its own weight ratio of male and female brain. But in all ethnic groups the dependence can be traced: the front part of the brain is the male, and the rear is the female.

Men have more hippocampus, more nerve cells. Women have less hippocampus, and the nerve cells are less, but they are best used

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/4/womens-brains-smaller-mens-used-more-efficiently/

Senses are more developed in women. Their skin has ten times more receptors than male skin. During certain times of the menstrual cycle the odor sense of women is hundred times more sensitive than of men. She perceives pheromones of other people better through the special body organ (Vomero Nasal Organ). Therefore, women better guess sexual desire and emotions experienced by human – fear, anger, sadness …, they have the better visual memory.

Men adapted better to the hunting and moving to greater distances. They had to silently follow the prey, even for more than one day. But then they had to seek their cave again: alone or with their relatives. According to some data, the pre-historical person met only about 150 persons. The brain of the woman is good for the growing and learning of children, and it supposes the verbal interco

Men are often more kinesthetic than women, namely they perceive the world through movement and action. Women are more auditory than men. Women speak without thinking, and men act without thinking. Woman listens by two hemispheres of the brain normally, and men – by one. Women are more talkative. The talk of others is perceived through sighs, eye movements, head, change of posture, etc.

Woman remembers more details than a man for whom the remembering of the important is the summarizing thought. At the age of 9 years old the girls outperform boys for two years in the development of verbal intelligence. Having more developed verbal intelligence, women are more involved in verbal interaction and communication. Men are more capable of action, competition. All these things are reflected in the structure of the brain of men and women.

Here is the most sufficient opinion concerning this matter: “The strong differences between male and female brain at the level of organization of some parts of the cortex of the forebrain were revealed. Changing of the lobes of the brain has shown that by men the front half of the brain is more voluminous, and by women – the rear." (Buchstab, 1884). "The part (insula cerebri) of the male brain is significantly different from the part of the female brain. In the male brain the central sulcus part (sulcus centralis insulae) is well expressed in 80% of cases, and in the female brain it is expressed in 65%. Long groove (sulcus longus insulae) in men is found only in 23%, and in women in 35% of cases”. [13]

Previously, social motivators had the feminine origin; they had empathy, female sensitivity. Let us call them social motivators with the features of empathy. Social motivators with traits of empathy feel other people and empathy came into force in accordance with their interests. This allowed the tribes to maintain up to 200 – 300 people, where the head of the tribe was a woman-mother, sometimes her brother. Matriarchy in force of the empathetic property of women was not the absolute power of the latter. It was a harmony of interests of everyone supported by women. And for the sake of everyone, for the most part they agreed to cast out the tribe of those who shook the great power of bringing people together. This force was beneficial psychologically and economically, since it gave the opportunity to increase the social division of labour – the most important factor of the productivity growth in the community. It was woman-like wisely, but the most capable and the most antisocial members of the tribe sometimes suffered.

Yes, it is the latent force of human development. It is hidden behind the relationship of struggle and cooperation between the various psycho-types of people – men and women, social motivators and domain experts. Later it became also the relationship of struggle and cooperation between other psycho-types: extroverts and introverts and others. The further the society went in its development, the greater was the typological diversity inherent to it, the greater role in its development was played by the relationship between the different psychological types. But it is the hidden motive force of social development.

More and more different psycho-types appear with the growth of the social division of labour. The social motivators with the empathic features were changed by the social motivators without the expressed empathy; they were more cu